Skip to content

Add a guide for agentic access to GitHub via Beams - #69580

Draft
ptgott wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
paul.gottschling/2026-08-11-github
Draft

Add a guide for agentic access to GitHub via Beams#69580
ptgott wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
paul.gottschling/2026-08-11-github

Conversation

@ptgott

@ptgott ptgott commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add a guide to using Beams with Teleport-protected GitHub organizations in docs/pages/beams. Unlike the database guide, this guide does not lend itself to a quick, single-purpose demo, so the guide offloads the work of setting up GitHub with Teleport to our pre-existing tutorial. This guide provides a high-level overview of the flow for using Beams with a Teleport-protected GitHub organization.

Related changes:

  • Edit guide titles: Since the GitHub guide cannot be a demo guide, edit the database guide to make the titles of the two guides consistent.
  • Also add an audit step to the database guide. The GitHub guide adds step to check audit events. Mirror this change in the database guide since it's a straightforward edit.

@ptgott ptgott added no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry backport/branch/v18 no-test-plan Bypasses the test plan validation bot labels Aug 11, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Amplify deployment status

Branch Commit Job ID Status Preview Updated (UTC)
paul.gottschling/2026-08-11-github e9dc9e0 2 ✅SUCCEED paul-gottschling-2026-08-11-github 2026-08-11 19:57:33

Preview links for changed docs pages

Add a guide to using Beams with Teleport-protected GitHub organizations
in `docs/pages/beams`. Unlike the database guide, this guide does not
lend itself to a quick, single-purpose demo, so the guide offloads the
work of setting up GitHub with Teleport to our pre-existing tutorial.
This guide provides a high-level overview of the flow for using Beams
with a Teleport-protected GitHub organization.

Related changes:
- Edit guide titles: Since the GitHub guide cannot be a demo guide, edit
  the database guide to make the titles of the two guides consistent.
- Also add an audit step to the database guide. The GitHub guide adds
  step to check audit events. Mirror this change in the database guide
  since it's a straightforward edit.
@ptgott
ptgott force-pushed the paul.gottschling/2026-08-11-github branch from 0317bf8 to e9dc9e0 Compare August 11, 2026 19:48
@ptgott
ptgott marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2026 19:56

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e9dc9e0ee7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/pages/beams/github.mdx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we should wait for the GitHub integration to ship before adding GitHub docs. Thougths?

@ptgott
ptgott marked this pull request as draft August 17, 2026 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport/branch/v18 documentation no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry no-test-plan Bypasses the test plan validation bot size/md

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants